Appendix G:
Assessment Project
Department of Communication and
Theatre Arts
University of Wisconsin Colleges
Analytical Skills Assessment Rubrics
August 2003
1. Performance Indicator: Analyze, synthesize, evaluate
and interpret information and ideas.
|
Exceeds Expectations |
- Synthesizes or
evaluates information and ideas (i.e., evidence, statements, graphics, and
questions) very well
- Refutes bias, if
present
- Analyzes and
evaluates alternative points of view
- Draws conclusions and
examines implications
|
|
Meets Expectations |
- Synthesizes or
evaluates information and ideas (i.e., evidence, statements, graphics, and
questions) adequately
- Detects bias, if
present
- Identifies or offers
alternative points of view, where possible
- Draws conclusions
|
|
Fails to Meet
Expectations |
- Fails to synthesize
or evaluate information and ideas (i.e., evidence, statements, graphics,
and questions)
- Fails to note bias,
if present
- Does not recognize
alternative points of view.
- Fails to draw
conclusions
|
2.
Performance Indicator: Construct and support hypotheses and arguments.
|
Exceeds Expectations |
- Hypothesis/argument
utilizes course information in an insightful way
|
|
Meets Expectations |
- Hypothesis/argument
is testable
- Hypothesis/argument
utilizes course information appropriately
- The premises of the
hypothesis/argument are clear and support the conclusion
|
|
Fails to Meet
Expectations |
- Hypothesis/argument
is not testable
- Hypothesis/argument
does not utilize course information appropriately
- The premises of the
hypothesis/argument are not clear and do not support the conclusion
|
3. Performance Indicator: Select and apply scientific
and other appropriate methodologies.
|
Exceeds Expectations |
Selection of
Methodologies:
- The student indicates
an understanding of the concept of multiple methodologies for solving
problems
Application of
Methodologies:
- The selected method
is correctly applied
- The student has
described alternative ways of applying methodology (if applicable)
- Documentation is
complete and contains few errors (if applicable)
|
|
Meets Expectations |
Selection of
Methodologies:
- The method selected
is appropriate to the problem
Application of
Methodologies:
- The selected method
is generally applied correctly with few errors
|
|
Fails to Meet
Expectations |
Selection of
Methodologies:
- The method selected
is inappropriate to the problem or simply describes a randomly selected
solution
Application of
Methodologies:
- The application of
the methodology is incorrect, incomplete, or has key steps omitted
|
4. Performance Indicator: Integrate knowledge and
experience to arrive at creative solutions.
|
Exceeds Expectations |
Solution:
- The proposed solution
addresses all aspects of the problem, and the implementation is both
practical and reasonable
Knowledge:
- The student is able
to identify and use relevant knowledge (research, lecture,
experimentation, class discussion, and/or experience) to arrive at a
solution
|
|
Meets Expectations |
Solution:
- The proposed solution
addresses the key aspects of the problem
- Some thought has been
given to implementation strategy
Knowledge:
- The student is able
to identify and use basic knowledge (through using research, lecture,
experimentation, class discussion, and/or experience) to arrive at a
solution
|
|
Fails to Meet
Expectations |
Solution:
- The proposed solution
does not solve the problem as stated or the proposed solution is wholly
impractical to implement
Knowledge:
- The student is not
able to either identify or use relevant knowledge to arrive at a solution.
|
5. Recognize fallacies and inconsistencies.
|
Exceeds Expectations |
- Can provide evidence
and/or explain fallacies and inconsistencies
|
|
Meets Expectations |
- Accurately
recognizes/identifies fallacies and inconsistencies
|
|
Fails to Meet
Expectations |
- Fails to
recognize/identify fallacies and inconsistencies
|
6. Performance Indicator: Gather and assess information
from printed sources, electronic sources, and observation.
|
Exceeds Expectations |
- Can articulate the
credibility or reliability of all or most sources
- Gathers information
from multiple points of view that target the task, project, or problem at
hand
|
|
Meets Expectations |
- Knows the differences
between types of sources, e.g., newspaper vs. professional journal
- Understands the
differences in types of information between each type of source
- Can articulate the
credibility or reliability in many sources
- Gathers appropriate
information for assignment
|
|
Fails to Meet
Expectations |
- Does not know the
differences between types of sources
- Does not understand
the differences in types of information between each type of source
- Does not articulate
the credibility or reliability in many sources
- Does not gather
appropriate information for assignment
|